So Upworthy had this video inquiring whether they were for women's rights:
What really irked me is that men still equate the word feminism with some less than manly feeling. I don't know if it's word association because feminism sounds like feminine and they just avert the whole word or what, but I tell you one thing, my future husband, WILL BE A DAMN FEMINIST AND PROUD OF IT! That's all I have to say! :)
Tuesday, February 10, 2015
Friday, October 24, 2014
Russell Brand is RIGHT!
Often times, stars will quietly give their support to causes they believe in. However, they don't risk the political persecution and the comforts of their fame for their core morals. Russell Brand does it. And for that I applaud him. At least he has the bollocks to stand up, out and loud, calling for society to wake up. For human-kind to stop being "brain-washed" by corporations, politicians, media-moguls and whatever other "Captain Overlords" out there. I've preached to my friends, family and others to pull their heads out of their bums and grab a clue...the "zombie-apocalypse" is the silver-spoon selects creating a mockery out of us, the worker --the food source for the elite leeches-- as they continue to rob us blind, keep us "functioning poor" or less, all while entertaining us with fictionalize monsters and over-popularized "reality" shows and stars.
Watch the video, pay attention to the tactics the interviewer tries to use in efforts to deflect his own personal views and over-dramatize and skew some of Brand's points. BTW, the daft chart included data from the 1870s, and I sternly believe none of us working class, want to return the periods when luxury was something held in a dream, when modern-medicine was in its infancy and the quality of living-- did I mention inflation?--were light-years away for our reality now.
Tuesday, June 10, 2014
The Exhaustion of Racism...
“Black people are normal people deserving of the same respect afforded to anyone else, but they often aren’t given that respect due to the machinations of white supremacy.” -Cord Jefferson
Today, when I thanked President Obama for signing an act to cap the amount students have to payback on student loans to 10%, I received this hateful Twitter response from screen name @joeboogersbiggz that called for "death to our nation's leader and all politicians...to have their blood run through the streets..." Thankfully it was deleted by Twitter, but "what's seen can't be unseen."
And, now I worry...for our leader and country, for my sons (who are mixed race) and I get an unsettling feeling. Who knew some of our citizens would turn a simple "thank you for your help" into an atrociously ugly moment? This Aquarius of violence and hatred is seeping out at a rate that stifles my revolutionary thoughts of improving the daily injustices done unto anybody. Though I don't like a lot of what our elected leaders are doing, never once did I think to murder them...to return to a barbaric mode of thinking that toppled kingdoms and wiped out civilizations. And though I'm a rebel, with just cause, my philosophy is somewhere in between Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, John Locke and Gandhi. I have to believe reason and enlightenment will change the thoughts of radicals and simmer the unjust passions of the ignorant, who use racial slurs, slain the innocent and call for the blood of our leaders.
This is the preface I will use for my latest find by Cord Jefferson, who poignantly penned my exact frustrations regarding racism. You see, I've always been the token "black" friend, the girl who's twice as intelligent if not more than her Caucasian sisters but still can't land a "dream job" by word-of-mouth like my paler peers, or a woman, who dates a guy based on the manner in which he treats me and not just because "he's Black." (or White, Asian, Indian, British, French, etc. because there's good and bad of every race. So put whatever label you want in the blank!)
WE, AS INTELLECTS, ARE EXHAUSTED DISCUSSING THE INJUSTICES OF RACISM...OR SEXISM...OR ANY "-ISM" THAT FITS THE UNJUST TREATMENT OF ANY PERSON, ESPECIALLY REPEATED DISCUSSIONS WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT CHANGE!
To use Jefferson's words from his latest article on "The Racism Beat":
I’m ready for people in positions of power at magazines and newspapers and movie studios to recalibrate their understanding of what it means to talk about race in the first place. If America would like to express that it truly values and appreciates the voices of its minorities, it will listen to all their stories, not just the ones reacting to its shortcomings and brutality.
If this doesn’t eventually happen, I wonder how many more writers of color will come to the conclusion, as my colleague did, that this life we’ve made for ourselves is unsustainable. How many essays can go up before fatigue becomes anger becomes insanity? How many op-ed columns before you can feel the gruesomeness of trying to defend another dead black kid slowly hollowing you out? How many different ways can you find to say that you’re a human being?
If you’re black and your beat is to offer your thoughts and opinions on the degradation of black Americans, you’ll never want for steady work. A steady mind is not guaranteed.
Cord Jefferson, I thank you for your thoughts and inspiring this blog post. I hope to get the word of "exhausted racism" out there with you! Be well everyone!
Today, when I thanked President Obama for signing an act to cap the amount students have to payback on student loans to 10%, I received this hateful Twitter response from screen name @joeboogersbiggz that called for "death to our nation's leader and all politicians...to have their blood run through the streets..." Thankfully it was deleted by Twitter, but "what's seen can't be unseen."
 | Joe Booger Biggs (@JoeBoogerBiggz) |
@awakenlibrarian Continue to kill Obama supporters and Obama voters! Kill all the politicians now! Spill their blood in the streets now! | |
And, now I worry...for our leader and country, for my sons (who are mixed race) and I get an unsettling feeling. Who knew some of our citizens would turn a simple "thank you for your help" into an atrociously ugly moment? This Aquarius of violence and hatred is seeping out at a rate that stifles my revolutionary thoughts of improving the daily injustices done unto anybody. Though I don't like a lot of what our elected leaders are doing, never once did I think to murder them...to return to a barbaric mode of thinking that toppled kingdoms and wiped out civilizations. And though I'm a rebel, with just cause, my philosophy is somewhere in between Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, John Locke and Gandhi. I have to believe reason and enlightenment will change the thoughts of radicals and simmer the unjust passions of the ignorant, who use racial slurs, slain the innocent and call for the blood of our leaders.
This is the preface I will use for my latest find by Cord Jefferson, who poignantly penned my exact frustrations regarding racism. You see, I've always been the token "black" friend, the girl who's twice as intelligent if not more than her Caucasian sisters but still can't land a "dream job" by word-of-mouth like my paler peers, or a woman, who dates a guy based on the manner in which he treats me and not just because "he's Black." (or White, Asian, Indian, British, French, etc. because there's good and bad of every race. So put whatever label you want in the blank!)
WE, AS INTELLECTS, ARE EXHAUSTED DISCUSSING THE INJUSTICES OF RACISM...OR SEXISM...OR ANY "-ISM" THAT FITS THE UNJUST TREATMENT OF ANY PERSON, ESPECIALLY REPEATED DISCUSSIONS WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT CHANGE!
To use Jefferson's words from his latest article on "The Racism Beat":
I’m ready for people in positions of power at magazines and newspapers and movie studios to recalibrate their understanding of what it means to talk about race in the first place. If America would like to express that it truly values and appreciates the voices of its minorities, it will listen to all their stories, not just the ones reacting to its shortcomings and brutality.
If this doesn’t eventually happen, I wonder how many more writers of color will come to the conclusion, as my colleague did, that this life we’ve made for ourselves is unsustainable. How many essays can go up before fatigue becomes anger becomes insanity? How many op-ed columns before you can feel the gruesomeness of trying to defend another dead black kid slowly hollowing you out? How many different ways can you find to say that you’re a human being?
If you’re black and your beat is to offer your thoughts and opinions on the degradation of black Americans, you’ll never want for steady work. A steady mind is not guaranteed.
Cord Jefferson, I thank you for your thoughts and inspiring this blog post. I hope to get the word of "exhausted racism" out there with you! Be well everyone!
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Las Vegas
Courtesy of my BEST friend, Jolyn Brand, I recently did the Vegas, single-mom/girls weekend getaway! The picture below was the favored public picture because my dress was dynamite! :)
However, perhaps it was because we didn't know where to go, mid-thirties or what, but I've concluded that Vegas is for couples or young, hard-bodied eye-candy! I know that's harsh, but from what I experienced...that's my summation. Couples because you need someone to kiss when you hit at the Blackjack table! And, young 'uns because at 36, I just think it's plain-bloody ridiculous to walk around and balance on 6 in. stripper heels...or wedges for that matter!
Yes, I had an overall great time--minus the load of crap MGM gave us (i.e. Sure, we'll break your luggage, charge you extra for early check-in and then not have a room ready! Oh...and don't mind our house-keepers barging into your room despite the "Do not distrub" sign posted! )
Overall, Vegas gets 2 stars!!
However, perhaps it was because we didn't know where to go, mid-thirties or what, but I've concluded that Vegas is for couples or young, hard-bodied eye-candy! I know that's harsh, but from what I experienced...that's my summation. Couples because you need someone to kiss when you hit at the Blackjack table! And, young 'uns because at 36, I just think it's plain-bloody ridiculous to walk around and balance on 6 in. stripper heels...or wedges for that matter!
Yes, I had an overall great time--minus the load of crap MGM gave us (i.e. Sure, we'll break your luggage, charge you extra for early check-in and then not have a room ready! Oh...and don't mind our house-keepers barging into your room despite the "Do not distrub" sign posted! )
Overall, Vegas gets 2 stars!!
Monday, June 2, 2014
GABIFRESH: Absolutely a Soul Sister!
GABIFRESH: .: I started GabiFresh (originally named Young, Fat and Fabulous) in September 2008 after graduating college with an interest in fashion journ...
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
Parent Arrested Over Book w/Sexual Content
Recently, Todd Starnes of Fox News, wrote an article asserting his stance regarding a New Hampshire School's Defense of a Sexually Graphic Novel.
Here's an excerpt...at the least the portion I choose to reference in my response.
Heaven forbid the superintendent of schools be the arbiter of decency. So who, pray tell, is responsible for deciding whether children are exposed to pornographic literature?
“It’s a decision of the local community,” he told me.
I was especially intrigued by the school board’s official statement. Read carefully:
“The School District policies IGE, IJ, IJA, KEC (available on the school district website) refer to the procedures for the use of novels containing controversial material. The district will take immediate action to revise these policies to include notification that requires parents to accept controversial materials rather than to opt out. Furthermore, the notification will detail more specifically the controversial material.”
Did you catch the part about forcing parents to accept racy, bawdy novels rather than opt out?
This school district may very well be the poster child for why you should home school your children.
Author Jodi Picoult told the Union-Leader that she was aware of the controversy in Gilford. Her solution was to make the novel a family affair.
“Read the book with your kids, by all means use it as a springboard for discussion with your kids,” she told the newspaper.
And afterwards, why not take the whole family down to the local strip club for dinner and a show?
Baer told EAGNews.org that he believes the incident is proof that public schools are trying to indoctrinate children with moral relativism.
First, as a parent that actually parents and raise my children, I understand the parent's outrage at NOT being notified. Furthermore, as an educator for the past 14 years, I am shocked that the teacher omitted the policy in notifying the PARENTS via written and electronic form. However, my harmony stops there.
Yes, the excerpt referenced is graphic. But it's also indicative of what's going on in high schools NOW. The kids are either curious about or having sex. And, the ironic thing is that majority of the parents are in denial and/or not taking a more proactive role in educating their children about sex--dangers, pitfalls, risks, and possible outcomes--so it's left up to books, educators and mentors. So bluntly put, either do your job and have it done the way you want it. Or, pipe-down and let the educators, writers and peers educate your children. Yes, the choice is that simple.
I taught in high schools for 10 years as an English teacher. My shock at seeing pregnant girls in my classroom gave me the reality check that the censorship of these types of books (like the one centered in this controversy) is not needed. High school students are testing out their sexuality, figuratively AND literally. Honestly, if the worse case scenario is their reading about it, then count your blessings. Case in point, I about fell out of my chair, when my 17 years old student (who was 8 months pregnant) suggested that WE have a joint baby shower, as I was 30 years old and 8 months pregnant. To use their catch-phrase: WTH???? On what planet of crazy did that idea come from? Furthermore, what the Hades did your mother say when she found out that you were in high school pregnant? Her response to my questions..."she's happy she's going to be a grandmother!" WHATEVER. How's that for moral relativism?
I'm by no means saying that Picoult's book should be used as a sex manual or in self-help aspect, but what I AM saying is that insinuating that parents take their kids to the 'strip-club' because the school district refuses to censor the book is such a damn ridiculous suggestion it makes me wonder whether Starnes' soap-box has a "sexual taboo" hiding under it...heaven forbid anything worse...I wrote that to demonstrate how ridiculous and absurd pointless comments can be. Nevertheless, FoxNews does have a reputation of outlandish TV personalities that call themselves journalists/reporters. But that's another post...
I agree with the author's suggestion for parents to use it as a means to have a discussion about sex, BECAUSE MOST OF THEM ARE NOT!!! Take a look at the schools, whether they're on a TV show for being a teen and getting pregnant or in their first relationship and just "curious" how it works, if you don't parent teenagers, they will parent themselves...pay attention to the pun because the next name-calling will be "Grandma" or "Paw-Paw," Mr. Starnes.
Here's an excerpt...at the least the portion I choose to reference in my response.
Heaven forbid the superintendent of schools be the arbiter of decency. So who, pray tell, is responsible for deciding whether children are exposed to pornographic literature?
“It’s a decision of the local community,” he told me.
I was especially intrigued by the school board’s official statement. Read carefully:
“The School District policies IGE, IJ, IJA, KEC (available on the school district website) refer to the procedures for the use of novels containing controversial material. The district will take immediate action to revise these policies to include notification that requires parents to accept controversial materials rather than to opt out. Furthermore, the notification will detail more specifically the controversial material.”
Did you catch the part about forcing parents to accept racy, bawdy novels rather than opt out?
This school district may very well be the poster child for why you should home school your children.
Author Jodi Picoult told the Union-Leader that she was aware of the controversy in Gilford. Her solution was to make the novel a family affair.
“Read the book with your kids, by all means use it as a springboard for discussion with your kids,” she told the newspaper.
And afterwards, why not take the whole family down to the local strip club for dinner and a show?
Baer told EAGNews.org that he believes the incident is proof that public schools are trying to indoctrinate children with moral relativism.
First, as a parent that actually parents and raise my children, I understand the parent's outrage at NOT being notified. Furthermore, as an educator for the past 14 years, I am shocked that the teacher omitted the policy in notifying the PARENTS via written and electronic form. However, my harmony stops there.
Yes, the excerpt referenced is graphic. But it's also indicative of what's going on in high schools NOW. The kids are either curious about or having sex. And, the ironic thing is that majority of the parents are in denial and/or not taking a more proactive role in educating their children about sex--dangers, pitfalls, risks, and possible outcomes--so it's left up to books, educators and mentors. So bluntly put, either do your job and have it done the way you want it. Or, pipe-down and let the educators, writers and peers educate your children. Yes, the choice is that simple.
I taught in high schools for 10 years as an English teacher. My shock at seeing pregnant girls in my classroom gave me the reality check that the censorship of these types of books (like the one centered in this controversy) is not needed. High school students are testing out their sexuality, figuratively AND literally. Honestly, if the worse case scenario is their reading about it, then count your blessings. Case in point, I about fell out of my chair, when my 17 years old student (who was 8 months pregnant) suggested that WE have a joint baby shower, as I was 30 years old and 8 months pregnant. To use their catch-phrase: WTH???? On what planet of crazy did that idea come from? Furthermore, what the Hades did your mother say when she found out that you were in high school pregnant? Her response to my questions..."she's happy she's going to be a grandmother!" WHATEVER. How's that for moral relativism?
I'm by no means saying that Picoult's book should be used as a sex manual or in self-help aspect, but what I AM saying is that insinuating that parents take their kids to the 'strip-club' because the school district refuses to censor the book is such a damn ridiculous suggestion it makes me wonder whether Starnes' soap-box has a "sexual taboo" hiding under it...heaven forbid anything worse...I wrote that to demonstrate how ridiculous and absurd pointless comments can be. Nevertheless, FoxNews does have a reputation of outlandish TV personalities that call themselves journalists/reporters. But that's another post...
I agree with the author's suggestion for parents to use it as a means to have a discussion about sex, BECAUSE MOST OF THEM ARE NOT!!! Take a look at the schools, whether they're on a TV show for being a teen and getting pregnant or in their first relationship and just "curious" how it works, if you don't parent teenagers, they will parent themselves...pay attention to the pun because the next name-calling will be "Grandma" or "Paw-Paw," Mr. Starnes.
Friday, April 25, 2014
President Obama in His Best Role Ever!
I'm not a political junkie, but I do vote. I've never been a fan of Presidents simply because they're one person, leading three ring circus of opinionated, sometimes hypocritical "leaders" (I've yet to meet a politician that leads my cause effectively...but that's another post).
But what I appreciate about President Obama, as a man, is his humanity. He's not abashed to let down his guard or stand on the grounds of "political correctness," especially when it comes to the nation's children. I say this in reference to the Washington Post's tweet of the President Reading Maurice Sendak's Where the Wild Things Are, one of at least 10 Books Every Child Should Read. His character, something that's lost in a lot of souls, shines through at this moment. Is he perfect? No...neither am I. Am I his friend? No...but I'd like to think he's very selective in his choice of friends...just as I am.
But as a librarian, I can't recall a President getting into "character" to read for children. That's why I appreciate him and his leadership. I wouldn't trade shoes with him for a minute. Scrutiny is not my cup of tea. However, for this moment (and some additional moments, for he's read this beloved children's book SEVERAL times-see below) he's the BEST guy I know, who's using his character influence, justly!
But what I appreciate about President Obama, as a man, is his humanity. He's not abashed to let down his guard or stand on the grounds of "political correctness," especially when it comes to the nation's children. I say this in reference to the Washington Post's tweet of the President Reading Maurice Sendak's Where the Wild Things Are, one of at least 10 Books Every Child Should Read. His character, something that's lost in a lot of souls, shines through at this moment. Is he perfect? No...neither am I. Am I his friend? No...but I'd like to think he's very selective in his choice of friends...just as I am.
But as a librarian, I can't recall a President getting into "character" to read for children. That's why I appreciate him and his leadership. I wouldn't trade shoes with him for a minute. Scrutiny is not my cup of tea. However, for this moment (and some additional moments, for he's read this beloved children's book SEVERAL times-see below) he's the BEST guy I know, who's using his character influence, justly!
President Obama read "Where the Wild Things Are" to kids today. He got into it. http://t.co/jhQCnV5ChU pic.twitter.com/HMhj7AKg5C
— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) April 21, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)