Recently, Todd Starnes of Fox News, wrote an article asserting his stance regarding a New Hampshire School's Defense of a Sexually Graphic Novel.
Here's an excerpt...at the least the portion I choose to reference in my response.
Heaven forbid the superintendent of schools be the arbiter of decency. So who, pray tell, is responsible for deciding whether children are exposed to pornographic literature?
“It’s a decision of the local community,” he told me.
I was especially intrigued by the school board’s official statement. Read carefully:
“The School District policies IGE, IJ, IJA, KEC (available on the school district website) refer to the procedures for the use of novels containing controversial material. The district will take immediate action to revise these policies to include notification that requires parents to accept controversial materials rather than to opt out. Furthermore, the notification will detail more specifically the controversial material.”
Did you catch the part about forcing parents to accept racy, bawdy novels rather than opt out?
This school district may very well be the poster child for why you should home school your children.
Author Jodi Picoult told the Union-Leader that she was aware of the controversy in Gilford. Her solution was to make the novel a family affair.
“Read the book with your kids, by all means use it as a springboard for discussion with your kids,” she told the newspaper.
And afterwards, why not take the whole family down to the local strip club for dinner and a show?
Baer told EAGNews.org that he believes the incident is proof that public schools are trying to indoctrinate children with moral relativism.
First, as a parent that actually parents and raise my children, I understand the parent's outrage at NOT being notified. Furthermore, as an educator for the past 14 years, I am shocked that the teacher omitted the policy in notifying the PARENTS via written and electronic form. However, my harmony stops there.
Yes, the excerpt referenced is graphic. But it's also indicative of what's going on in high schools NOW. The kids are either curious about or having sex. And, the ironic thing is that majority of the parents are in denial and/or not taking a more proactive role in educating their children about sex--dangers, pitfalls, risks, and possible outcomes--so it's left up to books, educators and mentors. So bluntly put, either do your job and have it done the way you want it. Or, pipe-down and let the educators, writers and peers educate your children. Yes, the choice is that simple.
I taught in high schools for 10 years as an English teacher. My shock at seeing pregnant girls in my classroom gave me the reality check that the censorship of these types of books (like the one centered in this controversy) is not needed. High school students are testing out their sexuality, figuratively AND literally. Honestly, if the worse case scenario is their reading about it, then count your blessings. Case in point, I about fell out of my chair, when my 17 years old student (who was 8 months pregnant) suggested that WE have a joint baby shower, as I was 30 years old and 8 months pregnant. To use their catch-phrase: WTH???? On what planet of crazy did that idea come from? Furthermore, what the Hades did your mother say when she found out that you were in high school pregnant? Her response to my questions..."she's happy she's going to be a grandmother!" WHATEVER. How's that for moral relativism?
I'm by no means saying that Picoult's book should be used as a sex manual or in self-help aspect, but what I AM saying is that insinuating that parents take their kids to the 'strip-club' because the school district refuses to censor the book is such a damn ridiculous suggestion it makes me wonder whether Starnes' soap-box has a "sexual taboo" hiding under it...heaven forbid anything worse...I wrote that to demonstrate how ridiculous and absurd pointless comments can be. Nevertheless, FoxNews does have a reputation of outlandish TV personalities that call themselves journalists/reporters. But that's another post...
I agree with the author's suggestion for parents to use it as a means to have a discussion about sex, BECAUSE MOST OF THEM ARE NOT!!! Take a look at the schools, whether they're on a TV show for being a teen and getting pregnant or in their first relationship and just "curious" how it works, if you don't parent teenagers, they will parent themselves...pay attention to the pun because the next name-calling will be "Grandma" or "Paw-Paw," Mr. Starnes.
